69442e00

D. TRUMP v JEFFREY EPSTEIN

Wed, 25 Feb 2026 12:21:07 GMT

IF TRUMP IS INNOCENT THEN I AM POPE IN VATICAN

The US Department of Justice has not released bundles of documents from the Epstein files related to a woman who accused US President Donald Trump and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse when she was few months short of her 14 ^th birthday.

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation interviewed the woman four times in 2019 in connection with the alleged abuse allegations in the 1980s. However, the current Justice Department has only released documents from the first interview. Media NPR found that the next three interviews likely represent more than 50 pages of material that have not been published.

The question here is whether the US Attorney General Lying?

The woman claimed that Trump forced her to perform oral sex on her 35 years ago when she was not even 14 years old and then hit her, MS NOW television also reported. Democratic Congressman Robert Garcia of California said the Justice Department appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with a person who accused President Trump of horrific crimes.

US Attorney General Pam Bondi claims that all documents in the files have been released (My comment: Only stupid people would believe this).

The Telegraph has uncovered documents showing that Jeffrey Epstein paid private investigators to remove computers and photos from his Florida home before a police raid in 2000, then hid the material in a network of at least six secret storage facilities across the US.

Credit card receipts reviewed by The Telegraph show regular payments to these storage facilities from 2003 until 2019, when Epstein died. Search warrants reviewed by The Telegraph show that US authorities never raided any of these facilities.

Epstein's brother told The Telegraph that he knew nothing about the storage facilities. Florida law allows storage facilities to auction off the contents of the facilities if rent is unpaid for 60 days.

Whether the materials in these storage facilities were destroyed, auctioned off, moved or are still in a rented storage facility after Epstein's death is currently unclear. What a joke!

If Donald Trump is innocent then I am a Pope in Vatican what I am not!

SHOW MUST GO ON ...

Sat, 07 Sep 2024 04:48:28 GMT

IT IS INSANE! DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND

Make no mistake, daily life goes on in the face of adversity which has become a familiar feature of Ukrainian society. Opera houses and theatres have remained open since the first weeks of the invasion, Kyiv’s restaurant and bar scene is vibrant at least until the midnight curfew approaches, and the Black Sea beaches are filled with holidaymakers in the hot summer months. On top of which President Zelensky even authorised the opening of Ukrainian fashion week.

War – what war is in Ukraine?

This is like a joke – a perfect scenario from the previous comedian and now the President of Ukraine. I wrote about this in previous articles. The Ukraine “war” was a perfect foil for leaders who had failed in their own countries - like Boris Johnson, or even Joe Biden, who both needed some distraction for their countries’ own problems, e.g. Brits did not concentrate on the failure of conservative party, and everybody had a happy Christmas.

The question which I have repeatedly asked, even to the new government, is “How long will the United Kingdom support all of this?”

There were no answers from the conservative party previously. However, I am speechless that I have not received any answer from the NEW United Kingdom government.

Instead, what I received was a letter from the government informing me that if I do not disclose all the names of my supporters and investors, with all the names, bank accounts, phone numbers and email addresses, I will be in contempt of court and jailed.

This is the thank you from the new government who I wanted to be elected; the government where over 400 of my volunteers were knocking on doors during the 2024 General Election campaign and made a huge effort to ensure Steve Reed, Sara Jones, Ellie Reeves, Natasha Irons were elected.

This is also the “thank you” from the new Labour government, to whom I was about to donate a minimum of €5.7 billion from a pharmaceutical contract which I did not want to give to Boris Johnson when he was Prime Minister of United Kingdom. I have stipulated what this money should fund, and that I require a written and signed confirmation from Rachel Reeves, Chancellor of Exchequer and Johnathan Reynolds, Secretary of Business to my solicitors that €5.7bn and £3.1bn will be spent as per my request and on nothing else.

Perhaps because I was so eager against supporting Ukraine, I will now be accused of being a supporter of Putin.

When Blair followed George W Bush into the war with Iraq and then against Gadhafi, I was against this, as there were no weapons of mass destruction anywhere – just the full mouth of Saddam Hussein’s garbage which kept aside the enemies like Iran.

Make no mistake, when Saddam and Gadhafi were around there were no ISIS or Hamas or Iranian activities against others; there were also no migrant crossings of the Mediterranean Sea, as Gadhafi had made a deal with the Italian president at the time. Europe would still be without 10.8 million migrants, who subsequently entered EU soil after Gadhafi and Saddam were “taken to the cleaners” by the British and American armed forces.

The same mistake is being made again with Ukraine. What this war has highlighted is that Putin gets huge support from China, Korea, India and even Iran. This would not be happening if the West had not interfered in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

Make no mistake, when it comes to using Western-made high-precision long-range weapons, it is a completely different story. It is not rocket science that the Ukrainian army is not capable on its own of making strikes with modern high-precision long-range systems of Western manufacture. They simply can’t do that. For long range missiles, data needs to be configured through computers using satellite data, which Ukraine does not have. Joe Biden and Keir Starmer should not give this the green light. It is as simple as that.

The satellites are currently in the hands of the EU and US and are de facto NATO satellites. China, Japan, Saudi Arabia, India, North Korea and a few others will not allow Ukraine to be given the green light to use these satellites to attack Russia. This system can only be operated by military professionals working as part of NATO. Ukrainian soldiers cannot do this. It is not a matter of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons, or not. This is about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in a military conflict or not. If this decision is adopted, it will mean nothing less than the direct participation of NATO countries, the USA and European countries including the United Kingdom in the war in Ukraine. This is their direct involvement. And this, of course, radically changes the very essence and the very nature of the conflict. This will mean that the NATO countries, the USA and European countries including United Kingdom are at war with Russia.

Moscow has a legitimate right to announce that the West attacked Russia. The risk of retaliation against the EU and US using nuclear missiles becomes ever closer.

The West has already helped destroy the Russian warship The Moskva which sank in the Black Sea, which was the pride and joy of the Russian army. The Ukrainian army could not have sunk this ship without the one missile being satellite guided and I believe Putin is still a bit pisted-off because of this.

So, while fashion week in Kyiv goes on, the UK and US government are giving the green light to give Ukraine even more support with even more weapons - not just ordinary weapons, but long-range ballistic missiles. All of this in the name of “fighting the enemy (Russia)”, who is not even an enemy. The West are making Russia be the enemies, just like in the cold war during the 50’s.

It’s insane.

GREENFIELD TOWER FIRE INQUIRY REPORT

Tue, 03 Sep 2024 04:48:28 GMT

Seven years after flames engulfed Grenfell Tower, a public housing block in West London, killing 72 people, a public inquiry on Wednesday blamed unscrupulous manufacturers, a cost-cutting local government and reckless deregulation for the disaster, Britain’s worst residential fire since World War II.

The 1,671-page final report laid out a litany of corner-cutting, dishonest sales practices, incompetence and lax regulation that led to the tower being wrapped in cheap flammable cladding, which, after it caught fire in the early hours of June 14, 2017, quickly turned the building into an inferno.

Many of the causes laid out in the report were documented in months of testimony before the inquiry, which was chaired over a seven-year period by a retired judge, Martin Moore-Bick.

But the report painted a damning picture of a Conservative-run local council, eager to reduce costs, working with careless, acquiescent contractors who installed combustible cladding panels, purchased from suppliers who knew they should never have been used in a high-rise building.

The suppliers “engaged in deliberate and sustained strategies to manipulate the testing processes, misrepresent test data, and mislead the market,” the report said. In the case of the flammable foam insulation, it said a key regulator, the Building Research Establishment, “was complicit in that strategy.”

Among the companies that came under the harshest criticism was Arconic, an American aluminum maker formerly known as Alcoa. It sold the cladding for Grenfell, the report said, but “deliberately concealed from the market the true extent of the danger” of using it in a high-rise structure.

Arconic has previously acknowledged its role in the disaster as one of the material suppliers to Grenfell, though it continues to argue that the product it sold was “safe to use as a building material.” It declined to send a representative to a meeting in which relatives of the victims spoke about their ordeal.

The publication of the report is a milestone in the aftermath of the Grenfell tragedy, which has haunted Britain since 2017, when images of the burning building and of the desperate efforts to save its trapped residents appalled the British public. In the years since, Grenfell has become a politically charged symbol of the hazards of deregulation and of the persistent social inequality in Britain’s capital.

CONSPIRACY THEORY about MIKE LYNCH

Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:05:55 GMT

There are questions to be answered:

What was captain James Cutfield doing?

The question No.1 would be what did the 51 year-old captain from New Zealand James Cutfield doing and thinking, and why the superyacht there and not behind the wall in the harbour? This for me being a sailor myself is an unprecedented mistake which any captain should not make. Why he is not charged for manslaughter and shipwreck? Captain is one of survivors of the tragedy.

What was the sailor Matthew Griffith doing?

The sailor as part of crow staff should liaise with all other staff members in respect of yacht safety during the sailing or when is in harbour. So, why Mr Griffith did not ask captain why we are staying out of harbour? Why is he not charges same as captain? Sailor is also one of survivors.

What was ship engineer Tim Parker Eaton doing?

The same as for the captain and sailor apply for Tim Parker Eaton. If the yacht was there because of engine or other failure it was his responsibility to liaise with the captain and captain should make a call to harbour for help that the yacht could be in the harbour behind the wall for possible repair. So, why this has not happened? And for me, Tim Parker Eaton should be held responsible and charged same as captain and sailor. Ship engineer also one of the survivors.

Make no Mistake

The victims of the Bayesian’s sinking included Lynch and his 18-year-old daughter, Hannah, his lawyer and his wife.

However, fifteen people survived including Lynch’s wife, whose company owned the Bayesian and she is the one who will get everything. Nearly everything as Mike Lynch now dead, and his lawyers also death, this is the "green light" for Hewlett Packard Enterprise to push ahead with a high court lawsuit against the estate of the deceased tech tycoon Mike Lynch in which they might seeking damages of up to £3bn.

Alongside Lynch and his daughter, the dead were the yacht’s chef, Recaldo Thomas; Morgan Stanley International’s bank chair, Jonathan Bloomer; his wife, Judy; Chris Morvillo, a Clifford Chance lawyer, and his wife, Neda.

For me still a bit unclear what involvement here will have (or have had) Angela Bacares, Mike's wife who inherit 13 years Mike Lynch battle with HP where he received compensation of courts proceedings in the United Stets of over £14 bn.

Conspiracy theory open their doors wildly ...